Podobne habilitacje – różne oceny – różne zakończenia
Podobne habilitacje – różne oceny – różne zakończenia

Academic Journal of Modern Philology vol. 4 (2015)

Aleksander Szwedek
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Podobne habilitacje – różne oceny – różne zakończenia.
A Stylistic Comparison.

Abstract

Similar Post-Doctoral Degrees, Different Opinions, Different Endings.
The following article addresses two reviews of post-doctoral publications, both of which are scandalous on formal and substantive levels. The key  elements related to the issue are the same person (professor), acting both as a reviewer in one case, and as a committee chair in the other, along with  two dramatically different final decisions concerning both post-doctoral applications. This review seeks to address two articles by Anna Bączkowska  and a monograph by Dorota Zielińska-Długosz. Aside from a substantive evaluation, I address the issue of ethical conduct in relation to “Kodeks etyki  pracownika naukowego” PAN (Polish Academy of Sciences Scolar’s Ethics Code). The ground of professional ethics is important not only in relation to  both authors’ publications, but also to the process of post-doctoral degree procedure.

Keywords: ethics, post-doctoral degree, review Dorota Zielińska-Długosz, Anna Bączkowska, Piotr Stalmaszczyk.

Full text: Podobne habilitacje – różne oceny – różne zakończenia.

Return to Academic Journal of Modern Philology (eng)

Powrót na stronę główną Academic Journal of Modern Philology (pl)

HRBottom links ects ds
© 2017 Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna
Ochrona danych osobowych